Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Conny Perrin vs Susan Bandecchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Perrin vs Bandecchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Conny Perrin vs Susan Bandecchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Perrin 1 - 1 Bandecchi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Perrin has won 48.78% of points on their second serve, while Bandecchi has won 47.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Perrin, in recent form, has won 59.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bandecchi has won 57.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.78% and 41.72% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Perrin has saved 45.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bandecchi has saved 56.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Perrin has won 48.89% of matches played (W/L 22/ 23), with Bandecchi winning 52.46% (W/L 32/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Perrin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 137/ 104), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 51/ 47). Bandecchi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 46/ 31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Perrin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 21/ 21), where as Bandecchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 28/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Perrin winning 1 times and Bandecchi being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Perrin winning 2 and Bandecchi winning 3. The last match between Perrin and Bandecchi was at the W25 Salinas, 15-05-2021, Semifinals, Hard with Susan Bandecchi getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Perrin and Bandecchi have played a deciding set 1 times, with Perrin winning 1 times and Bandecchi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Perrin winning 0, and Bandecchi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Perrin has played against opponents with an average rank of 252.62 while Bandecchi has played against players with an average rank of 364.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Perrin has won 22% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bandecchi has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Perrin has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bandecchi has converted 46.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
379
Rank
134
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
344
Rank
164
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
56% (523-417)
Career Total W/L
58% (263-193)
38% (5-8)
YTD W/L
59% (16-11)
$168,627
Career Prize Money
$93,621
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Conny Perrin | Susan Bandecchi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 20 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:30 | 1:52:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (84/136) | 64% (105/163) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (53/84) | 62% (65/105) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (27/52) | 52% (30/58) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (6/21) | 47% (7/15) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (68/163) | 41% (56/136) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Conny Perrin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Conny Perrin
Player
Susan Bandecchi
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Conny Perrin | Susan Bandecchi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (5/8) | 59% (16/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (12/16) | 54% (35/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (114/124) | 53% (321/281) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 67% (12/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 23 | 37 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 24 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:57 | 1:54:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 264.38 | 431.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (440/686) | 70% (1349/1930) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (267/440) | 60% (812/1349) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (120/246) | 48% (280/581) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (42/90) | 48% (120/251) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (335/754) | 47% (902/1899) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 59% (16/11) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 67% (8/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 23% (13/3) |
Conny Perrin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aurora Zantedeschi
Player
Conny Perrin
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Conny Perrin
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Conny Perrin
Player
Sofya Lansere
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Conny Perrin
Player
Sofia Shapatava
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Conny Perrin
Player
Estelle Cascino
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Conny Perrin
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Conny Perrin
Player
Giulia Pereira De Aguiar
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Conny Perrin
93%
(
50 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Conny Perrin
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Susan Bandecchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
72%
(
86 of
119)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
109
|
1-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Elvina Kalieva
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Solana Sierra
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Anna Ureke
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Susan Bandecchi
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Tatiana Pieri
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Susan Bandecchi
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Lisa Pigato
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
81%
(
21 of
26)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Susan Bandecchi
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
53%
(
47 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Perrin Vs Bandecchi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
